<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>Stephen Caver</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stephencaver.com/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://stephencaver.com/atom.xml" />
    <id>tag:stephencaver.com,2007-08-17://1</id>
    <updated>2008-03-14T15:29:16Z</updated>
    
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Publishing Platform 4.0</generator>

<entry>
    <title>The Status of this Blog</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stephencaver.com/2008/03/the-status-of-this-blog.html" />
    <id>tag:stephencaver.com,2008://1.73</id>

    <published>2008-03-14T15:21:04Z</published>
    <updated>2008-03-14T15:29:16Z</updated>

    <summary>I feel I should post something here just to give anybody who comes across this site information on what is going on. There are a two reasons for lack of resent updates. Well, that if you don&amp;#8217;t count my tendency...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Stephen</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://stephencaver.com/">
        I feel I should post *something* here just to give anybody who comes across this site information on what is going on. There are a two reasons for lack of resent updates. Well, that if you don&apos;t count my tendency to throw caution to the wind and jump on Xbox after I get home from work.

First of all, I just recently moved across Orange County from Huntington Beach to Irvine. Moving, as anybody who has done so before, sucks. Sucks, sucks, sucks, sucks, sucks. My new apartment is definitely an upgrade, but it has been a time and energy drain of late. All of that is behind me now, so I will now begin looking to the future. 

Secondly, despite my initial impressions of Movable Type 4, it hasn&apos;t lived up to the expectation. The interface and templating system rocks, but it runs so entirely slow on my hosting that it makes updating a tedious and painful process. That is not how it should be.

I&apos;ve decided that I&apos;m going to move over to Expression Engine, as both a way to get to know Expression Engine a little better and hopefully the performance over Movable Type. Anyway, this site could use some adjustments, anyway, so I&apos;ll also be tweaking the design a bit. 

Now if I can just find some time to do all this in, we&apos;ll be golden. 
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Darwin</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stephencaver.com/2008/02/darwin.html" />
    <id>tag:stephencaver.com,2008://1.72</id>

    <published>2008-02-12T17:29:23Z</published>
    <updated>2008-02-12T17:35:08Z</updated>

    <summary> There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been originally breathed into a few forms or into one; and that, whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity,...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Stephen</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <category term="darwinday" label="darwin day" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="science" label="science" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://stephencaver.com/">
        &gt; There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been originally breathed into a few forms or into one; and that, whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been, and are being, evolved.

-- Charles Darwin, *The Origin of Species*

Happy Darwin Day.
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Hell Yeah The Plane Takes Off</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stephencaver.com/2008/01/hell-yeah-the-plane-takes-off.html" />
    <id>tag:stephencaver.com,2008://1.71</id>

    <published>2008-01-31T07:14:42Z</published>
    <updated>2008-01-31T07:34:48Z</updated>

    <summary>If you missed Mythbusters tonight, you missed a good one. The Mythbusters tested airplane on a conveyor belt myth which states: A plane is standing on a runway that can move (some sort of band conveyor). The plane moves in...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Stephen</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <category term="mythbusters" label="mythbusters" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="physics" label="physics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="science" label="science" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://stephencaver.com/">
        <![CDATA[If you missed Mythbusters tonight, you missed a good one. The Mythbusters tested [airplane on a conveyor belt myth](http://www.kottke.org/06/02/plane-conveyor-belt) which states: 

 > A plane is standing on a runway that can move (some sort of band conveyor). The plane moves in one direction, while the conveyer moves in the opposite direction. This conveyer has a control system that tracks the plane speed and tunes the speed of the conveyer to be exactly the same (but in the opposite direction). Can the plane take off?

If you know anything about physics, it should be immediately clear what will happen--the plane takes off. Jason Kottke, who had posed the question in an earlier blog entry, [was live blogging the event](http://www.kottke.org/08/01/mythbusters-airplane-on-a-conveyor-belt) (in my opinion every Mythbusters episode should be live blogged) and after watching the episode, reading Kottke's post and reading a majority of the comments to his post, I'm walking away with a few things on my mind.

First of all, why in the hell does Jason think the Mythbusters is "slow?" And who are these jokers in the comments that agree with him? This is the first time I've ever heard of somebody actually disliking Mythbusters. After all, it is the greatest show ever conceived. I'm a little miffed at the suggestion that it's not top notch quality entertainment for the whole family. I've been known, thanks to my craptastic Time Warner Cable DVR, to watch it through an entire weekend. Nonstop. My crush on Kari Byron burns red hot.

Mythbusters promotes science, dispels of silly ideas, and advocates critical thinking. A healthy skeptical attitude towards observing the world around us is a beautiful thing, and I applaud The Discovery Channel for putting the Mythbusters on. Lesser people watch Ghost Hunters. I think it is one of the most important shows on television. Right next to South Park (which I have said, and will say again, is the Shakespeare of our time). 

Plus, [Kari Byron](http://www.fhmonline.com/articles-1276.asp). Hello, Jason? [Kari Byron](http://www.fhmonline.com/articles-1276.asp). Need I say more?

That aside, there is this issue with the plane. Why the plane takes off is plainly (no pun intended) obvious. The energy being generated by the engine is being acted upon the air via propellers or a jet engine, not the ground. It is the force against the air that drives the plane forward and up to a speed where it can take off. If you disagree, you're wrong. I'm not making an argument for the plane taking off side, I'm simply stating what the facts are for backstory. No emails telling me I'm wrong, please. Because I'm not. I'm right.

What interests me the most about this (besides being so utterly flabbergasted that there are people out there who don't enjoy The Mythbusters on the scale I do) is that it shows how our brains are constantly deceiving ourselves. Intuitively, it seems like the plane would stay put. That is what us crazy upright apes, with our poorly evolved monkey brains, intuitively grasp. But that is not always the case. It is a classic example of *why* we need shows like Mythbusters that encourage [critical thinking](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_thinking) and a [healthy skeptical attitude](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_skepticism) about the world. 

After all, the Sun intuitively looks like it is orbiting the earth. And that took a little myth busting to crack as well. 

<b>Note:</b> Actually, to be technically correct, the earth doesn't orbit the sun. [The sun and earth orbit a common center of mass](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Center_of_mass#Animations). But you get what I mean.]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>The MacBook AirCraft</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stephencaver.com/2008/01/the-macbook-aircraft.html" />
    <id>tag:stephencaver.com,2008://1.70</id>

    <published>2008-01-30T17:41:30Z</published>
    <updated>2008-01-30T17:54:24Z</updated>

    <summary> Cupertino, CA Apple today at a special event held at Apple&amp;#8217;s Cupertino Headquarters responded to criticisms that the new MacBook Air was lacking key features such as a DVD drive, ethernet cable connection, and replaceable batteries. Introducing, the MacBook...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Stephen</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <category term="apple" label="Apple" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="humor" label="humor" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://stephencaver.com/">
        <![CDATA[<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/dexmerino/2221194388"><img src="http://stephencaver.com/images/2221194388_0bbf9db3ed_o.jpg" width="580" height="347" /></a>

<strong>Cupertino, CA</strong> Apple today at a special event held at Apple's Cupertino Headquarters responded to criticisms that the new MacBook Air was lacking key features such as a DVD drive, ethernet cable connection, and replaceable batteries. Introducing, the MacBook AirCraft.

The MacBook AirCraft presents a new turn for Apple in product philosophy. "We want to make sure every conceivable, antiquated and redundant technology is compatible with the Apple's products," said Steve Jobs from today's special event event. "We will be implementing these new features across Apple's product line over the next year and a half. We hope our customers bare with us as we roll out these changes," said Jobs. 

The MacBook AirCraft features a Superdrive for running CDs and DVDs, a Floppy Drive, USB and Firewire, as well as DVI output. "A handful of people have floppy disks left over from the early 90s, and we want to make sure that these people are able to find products in Apple's product line that meet their needs," said Phil Schiller, Apple's vice-president of Marketing. 

The MacBook AirCraft features an innovative new port hatch which flips down to reveal the features, hiding them from view when not in use. 

The MacBook AirCraft was met with considerable critical acclaim as Apple's stock rose 5 points after the announcement, despite the continuing downturn in the economy. However, some critics have noted that the MacBook AirCraft doesn't have an 8 inch floppy drive.

"There are at least five people who still have old 8 inch floppy disks sitting around," said John Dvorak, an industry analyst. 

Jobs, however, was not miffed. "We're making considerable strides to cater to every considerable edge case that people might encounter," said Jobs. He also noted that no other laptop on the market features a floppy drive. "Baby steps," noted Jobs, with a wink.]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Getting Better</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stephencaver.com/2007/12/getting-better.html" />
    <id>tag:stephencaver.com,2007://1.57</id>

    <published>2007-12-17T01:32:24Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-17T01:43:40Z</updated>

    <summary>Jeff Croft recently blogged about the state of Web Standards and the (lack of) innovation. While I&amp;#8217;m not going dive into the details at the moment, one thing stood out to me that I want to address. Jeff quotes Alex...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Stephen</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://stephencaver.com/">
        <![CDATA[[Jeff Croft recently blogged about the state of Web Standards](http://www2.jeffcroft.com/blog/2007/dec/16/do-we-need-return-browser-wars/) and the (lack of) innovation. While I'm not going dive into the details at the moment, one thing stood out to me that I want to address. [Jeff quotes Alex Russel](http://alex.dojotoolkit.org/?p=642):

> In order for the future to be better by a large amount, it must be different by a large amount.

Wrong.

We do not go from this:

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><a href="http://stephencaver.com/images/blog/1902_WrightBrosGlider.jpg"><img alt="1902_WrightBrosGlider.jpg" src="http://stephencaver.com/assets_c/2007/12/1902_WrightBrosGlider-thumb-250x297.jpg" width="250" height="297" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;"/></a></span>

To this: 

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><a href="http://stephencaver.com/images/blog/FGSQE.jpg"><img alt="FGSQE.jpg" src="http://stephencaver.com/assets_c/2007/12/FGSQE-thumb-250x165.jpg" width="250" height="165" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;"/></a></span>


overnight. Things get better *incrementally* and not in huge jumps. ]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Blogging From The Desktop</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stephencaver.com/2007/09/blogging-from-the-desktop-1.html" />
    <id>tag:stephencaver.com,2007://1.47</id>

    <published>2007-09-16T18:35:37Z</published>
    <updated>2007-09-16T18:35:37Z</updated>

    <summary>With starting this blog it has become abundantly clear that regulating my writing to Movable Type&apos;s own management system is an unideal way of working. Not to the detriment of Six Apart&apos;s work on MT, but it still runs slow...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Stephen</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://stephencaver.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>With starting this blog it has become abundantly clear that regulating my writing to Movable Type's own management system is an unideal way of working. Not to the detriment of Six Apart's work on MT, but it still runs slow as the dickens (something that seems to be common among Six Apart ventures&#8212;Vox as well crawls with snail like speed). Perhaps the failing is with me and my set-up, but for convience sake a smart weblog writer would do well with a desktop client to interface with his or her blog.</p>

<p>So far I've examined <a href="http://www.red-sweater.com/marsedit/">MarsEdit</a> and <a href="http://infinite-sushi.com/software/ecto/">Ecto</a>, yet I am still wont for a feature that I have not found in desktop clients. I need custom fields. Neither MarsEdit nor Ecto allow you to use custom fields, and perhaps this is just too large a task for a desktop editor. But it sure would make updating the reading list a whole lot easier.</p>

<p>That being said, it seems to me that MarsEdit is the clear winner between these two heavyweight blogging clients. The interface is much cleaner, and so far as I can tell, adequate for simple blogging actions. I'm still putting it through the motions, but so far, the winner seems to be MarsEdit.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Yesterday</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stephencaver.com/2007/09/yesterday.html" />
    <id>tag:stephencaver.com,2007://1.45</id>

    <published>2007-09-06T02:26:15Z</published>
    <updated>2007-09-06T02:29:26Z</updated>

    <summary>Yesterday was launch day here. It&amp;#8217;s a bit of a pre-mature launch, to be honest, as there are still some bugs crawling around the wood-works and I don&amp;#8217;t have résumés up, yet. Don&amp;#8217;t even think about clicking those links in...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Stephen</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Site News" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="launch" label="launch" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="stephencavercom" label="stephencaver.com" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://stephencaver.com/">
        Yesterday was launch day here. It&apos;s a bit of a pre-mature launch, to be honest, as there are still some bugs crawling around the wood-works and I don&apos;t have résumés up, yet. Don&apos;t even *think* about clicking those links in the sidebar! And keep your mouse away from that Internet Explorer icon! Ah, but everything will be spick and span very soon, rest-assured. 

I gave my presentation to the Art Institute faculty, yesterday. It went far better than I could have hoped 9 weeks ago. Thus, thank you so much Adam and Xtine for whipping me into some resembelence of a competant presenter. Oh, and that whole teaching thing, too. 

Here&apos;s to a new dawning day. 
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>BAM!</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stephencaver.com/2007/08/bam.html" />
    <id>tag:stephencaver.com,2007://1.35</id>

    <published>2007-08-30T09:13:58Z</published>
    <updated>2007-08-30T09:20:37Z</updated>

    <summary>I&amp;#8217;m sitting here, minding my business and casually reading a book in bed and then &amp;#8212; BAM! There goes a bright flash of light. I can see it in the window, tonight is one of those nights where I leave...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Stephen</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <category term="personal" label="personal" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="weather" label="weather" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://stephencaver.com/">
        I&apos;m sitting here, minding my business and casually reading a book in bed and then -- BAM!

There goes a bright flash of light. I can see it in the window, tonight is one of those nights where I leave the shades open. A thunder shot echos across the land. It rumbles for a good 20 seconds. The thin glass windows to my room rattle with the force of the thunder. As if to confirm that I am not easily startled, car alarms going off in the distance, dogs barking. I think I jumped a good two feet from my mattress.

Then silence. Then the soft prattle of rain. I go outside to take a look -- the clouds don&apos;t look menacing at all from where I am. I am confused. Weather.com says it&apos;s clear with 0% chance of precipitation. My ass.
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Having Passion</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stephencaver.com/2007/02/having-passion.html" />
    <id>tag:stephencaver.com,2007://1.9</id>

    <published>2007-02-25T03:22:21Z</published>
    <updated>2007-08-22T02:22:57Z</updated>

    <summary>Kathy Sierra points out that there is a difference in being passionate for the company and being passionate about the work, saying that employers should hold on to employees who are passionate about their work. She lists four questions which...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Stephen</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://stephencaver.com/">
        <![CDATA[Kathy Sierra points out that there is <a href="http://headrush.typepad.com/creating_passionate_users/2007/02/dont_ask_employ.html">a difference in being passionate for the company and being passionate about the work</a>, saying that employers should hold on to employees who are passionate about their work. 

She lists four questions which can be asked to determine if someone is passionate about their work. I thought I'd answer them here.

<blockquote>When was the last time you read a trade/professional journal or book related to your work? (can substitute "attended an industry conference or took a course")</blockquote>

If you count industry related blogs a "trade/professional journal" I read everyday. I also keep up with the latest industry related literature and right now I'm in the middle of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/About-Face-2-0-Essentials-Interaction/dp/0764526413"><em>About Face 2.0</em></a> by Alan Cooper. 

<blockquote>Name at least two of the key people in your field.</blockquote>

Jeffrey Zeldman, Jeff Veen, Eric Meyer, Andy Budd, Dave Shea, Mike Davidson, Shaun Inman, Jason Santa Maria ... the list goes on and on. 

<blockquote>If you had to, would you spend your own money to buy tools or other materials that would improve the quality of your work?</blockquote>

Absolutely. In fact, I've already spent some of my own money on tools. 

<blockquote>If you did not do this for work, would you still do it (or something related to it) as a hobby?</blockquote>

Certainly, that's how I became interested in this work in the first place, it was simply a hobby that I am attempting to turn into a career.]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Stuck in the Mud: More on Gender Diversity in the Web Industry</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stephencaver.com/2007/02/stuck-in-the-mud-more-on-gende.html" />
    <id>tag:stephencaver.com,2007://1.8</id>

    <published>2007-02-25T03:18:33Z</published>
    <updated>2007-08-22T02:21:08Z</updated>

    <summary>First, I just want to say that any criticism here is not meant personally towards any individual mentioned. These are all guys I respect incredibly. They are my heros. Eric Meyer, John Gruber, Jermery Keith and Anil Dash are all...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Stephen</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://stephencaver.com/">
        <![CDATA[First, I just want to say that any criticism here is not meant personally towards any individual mentioned. These are all guys I respect incredibly. They are my heros. Eric Meyer, John Gruber, Jermery Keith and Anil Dash are all people I look up to for inspiration. I must just speak my mind and hope that the questions I ask might somehow get answered.

The issue of gender diversity at web conferences is still a hot topic around the web. Big names are throwing their opinion into the ring. 

<a href="http://adactio.com/journal/1264">Jermery Keith</a> is disturbed and vows to do better next time with his web conference, d.Construct.

<a href="http://www.dashes.com/anil/2007/02/23/the_old_boys_cl">Anil Dash</a> rails on both <a href="http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2007/02/23/diverse-it-gets/">Eric Meyer</a> and <a href="http://daringfireball.net/2007/02/web_nerd_gender_diversity">John Gruber</a> for being dissenters. He calls Eric's desire to have a marketable conference "boring and unambitious" because he already has an audience. Anil calls John's argument the "laziest, least persuasive argument of all" and questions if he is not being "willfully naive." Funny, he doesn't seem to address John's argument at all. It seems to me that Anil has missed the big point John was trying to confront, the very same that I raised with my post on the topic. 

I'm not defending the status quo, not in the slightest. I don't disagree that seeing more women speakers at web conferences is important. What I'd like to see even more, though, is more women in the industry <em>in general</em>. I think picking on web conferences is far too shortsighted an approach, and I think the energy is better spent somewhere else. 

In our rush to solve this problem we need to figure out what the real cause is. People are blaming the organizers of web conferences. Perhaps fairly, perhaps unfairly, but I think it's reasonable to suggest that maybe, <em>just maybe</em>, the problem is a larger one inherent in the industry, not with any particular person, organization, or conference. Without addressing the big picture, we're going to be stuck spinning our wheels. 

I don't have the answers, but I think these questions haven't really been asked or addressed. Without doing so next year this debate will come up again, like it always does. And we'll still be stuck in the mud spinning our wheels.

Anyway, I'm going to be coming back to this later tonight. I would like to search out some female opinion on this and maybe then I'll have some further comments.

<em>Just a thought:</em> Maybe starting this blog by tackling gender diversity isn't a good idea. I just started this thing and already I find myself in a heated debate over something like this. Okay, not really debate, since no one reads this blog no one is responding to me. Anyway, I've never been one to shy away from controversial topics, and I'm here to speak my mind.]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Gender Diversity at Web Conferences</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stephencaver.com/2007/02/gender-diversity-at-web-confer.html" />
    <id>tag:stephencaver.com,2007://1.7</id>

    <published>2007-02-23T03:16:06Z</published>
    <updated>2007-08-22T02:18:21Z</updated>

    <summary>Jason Kottke recently addressed the problem of gender diversity at web conferences in the industry, pointing out that at web conferences men speakers outnumber women speakers by at least 4 men to every woman. This is, indeed, a troubling issue...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Stephen</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://stephencaver.com/">
        <![CDATA[Jason Kottke recently addressed <a href="http://www.kottke.org/07/02/gender-diversity-at-web-conferences">the problem of gender diversity at web conferences</a> in the industry, pointing out that at web conferences men speakers outnumber women speakers by at least 4 men to every woman. This is, indeed, a troubling issue that needs to be addressed by the industry at large. 

However, I must raise some issues that Jason neglects. When looking at the statistics we must ask ourselves a few other questions to put them in a larger perspective. What is the ratio of men to women in the web industry compared to the population at large? If it is disproportionate, why is that so? Could these statistics merely mirror the number of women in the industry? Does that mirror the larger population? 

The problem could be a larger one, and looking at the overall industry seems to be going more to the root of the problem than merely looking at web conferences. If there is a disproportionate amount of men to women in the web industry compared to the larger population we must address this issue before we start laying blame to those who are putting on conferences. The lack of women speakers could be derived from the larger issue of a lack of women in the industry.

I don't have any statistics to make a detailed assessment of this problem, if there is one. What needs to be done, before we start burning people at the stake, is to make a general overall assessment of the industry. From looking at the statistics of women speakers at conferences they would appear to closely map to the proportion of men to women in the interactive media design major at my school. This, of course, is not based on statistics but merely my observations. If that is representative of the entire industry (I'm not saying that it is), then we have a bigger problem.

Gender diversity at conferences is a very important issue. Women play an important role in our industry and we need to figure out if there is a reason why there are less women to men and if that maps to the larger population (my guess is that it doesn't). Bringing up a smaller issue like this is important, but I think there needs to be some context in which these statistics are brought up. ]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

</feed>
